The Guardian (Comment is Free) – Animal testing should not be shrouded in secrecy. We need real reform now
CitizenSci (PLoS blogs) – Coop’s Citizen Sci Scoop: What citizen science has told us
The Breakthrough Institute – Why Innovation Should Be at the Heart of Climate Policy
The Bridge (AGU Blogosphere) – 4 maps on America’s climate and energy outlook: 2 that will worry you, 2 that will give you hope
Climate Access – Moving below zero emissions
Institute of Hazard, Risk and Resilience blog – Rethinking climate change-induced migration and displacement
Climate Outreach & Information Network (COIN) (UK) – Science & stories: Bringing the IPCC to life
Environmental Communication – Media Frames and Cognitive Accessibility: What Do “Global Warming” and “Climate Change” Evoke in Partisan Minds? [Ahead of Print]
Just Publics @365 – Clear Communication is Vital in Emergency Response
The Breakthrough Institute –
- The Climate and Environmental Impacts of Renewables
- Growth of Biomass Far Outstrips Growth of Solar and Wind
Citizen Joe Smith – Stories of Change: arts and social sciences support energy transitions
Climate Central – ‘Catastrophe’ Claim Adds Fuel to Methane Debate
The Guardian (Eco Audit) – What is the most dangerous form of energy?
Cultural Cognition Project blog – So much for that theory . . . (fracking freaks me out #2)
Science & Technology (Manchester Policy Blogs) – Evidence ignored amid Lords committee’s bullishness on fracking
The Scholarly Kitchen – What Researchers Value from Publishers, Canadian Survey
SCIENCE – COLLABORATION
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology – The triple helix and international collaboration in science
SCIENCE – COMMUNICATION
COMPASS blogs – Burning Down Communication Barriers Among Fire Scientists
Making Science Public blog – Worms: Workhorses of science and science communication
Not Exactly Rocket Science (National Geographic) – On Science Journalism, Blogs, and The Wow Beat
Research to Action – Research and the media: fighting the anxiety
Speakers of Science blog – Non-Verbal Communication: What are we really saying?
SCIENCE – KNOWLEDGE USE
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology – Struggling for space and finding my place: An interactionist perspective on everyday use of biomedical information
SCIENCE – POLITICS / POLICY / & POLICY
Canadian Science Writers’ Association – Founder of foraging gene says understanding science affects policy-making
Discourse & Communication – Enacting identity in microblogging through ambient affiliation
The Guardian – UK government conducting secret badger sett-gassing trials
Sociological Imagination – Thirty Years On: Lessons from the Home Computer Boom
The Scholarly Kitchen – Keeping It Real — Are Our Technology Expectations Out of Whack?
OTHER ROUND UPS
The Atlantic – Bye Bye, Barbara: The Week’s Best Pop-Culture Writing
Don’t Get Caught (Communications blog) – The Weekend Read
Nieman Journalism Lab – This Week in Review: Behind The Times’ big change, and the FCC’s proposal moves forward
Not Exactly Rocket Science (National Geographic) – I’ve Got Your Missing Links Right Here (17 May 2014)
Social Media Examiner – Facebook Audience Insights: This Week in Social Media
Speakers of Science blog – Reads of the Week 16 May 2014 – Science Journalism, body clocks and more
This entry was posted in Record of the Week, Weekly Roundup and tagged animal testing, anthropology, blogging, citizen science, Climate Change, Climate Change Communication, communication, energy, fracking, OPEN ACCESS, scholarly communication, science policy, social media, technology.
It has been previously suggested that science blogging has facilitated the finding of collaborators for joint authorship (Batts, et al., 2008) or the gathering of benefits from users’ comments (Butler, 2005).
In various posts found in the blogosphere claims have been made about the influence of science blogging on the practice of science itself.
The story that’s usually mentioned is about a scientist blogger who becomes a co-author on paper as a result of his blog. The story is of the PhD student in genetics at the University of Georgia, Reed Cartwright. In 2005 he disagreed with, and consequently wrote an alternative interpretation of a published paper about the mutant hothead gene of Arabidopsis (Lolle, et al., 2005) in his blog De Rerum Natura. Luca Cornai, at the University of California, Davis was publishing a similar interpretation in the journal Plant Cell, several months later, when he found out about Cartwright’s blog and the already published similar interpretation. Cornai extended the offer of co-authorship on the Planet Cell paper to Cartwright (see Comai & Cartwright, 2005).
This story has been told in The Scientist (Secko, 2007), by Bonetta (2007), by Batts, et al., (2008) and most recently mentioned by Trench (2012).
I think there may be another story to add to this list.
I came across this story in the blog Retraction Watch 28 June 2012. The blog post is entitled, ‘Controversial paper on life-extending buckyballs corrected after blog readers note problems.’
Adam Marcus of Retraction Watch explains that this news was then picked up by Derek Lowe’s In the Pipeline blog. Lowe expressed both puzzlement and praise towards the work in question. However, as soon as the next day, a problem was identified. Lowe’s readers directed him to a blatant case of image duplication within the article. Sure enough, that was the case! Do refer to the post from Retraction Watch for more details.
The journal ended up printing a correction for the article. (It addressed the histology of the article as well as another image.)
So blogging can indeed have an impact on the conduct of science.
Baati, T. Bourasset, F., Gharbi, N., Njimb, L., Abderrabba, M., Kerkeni, A., Szwarc, H., Moussa, F. (2012). ‘The prolongation of the lifespan of rats by repeated oral administration of  fullerene,’ Biomaterials (in press): 1-11. (Found here.)
Batts, S.A., Anthis, N.J., Smith, T.C. (2008). ‘Advancing science through conversations: Bridging the gap between blogs and the academy,’ PLoS Biology 6(9): e240. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060240
Bonetta, L. (2007). ‘Scientists enter the blogosphere,’ Cell 129(3), 443–445. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.032
Butler, D. (2005). ‘Joint Efforts,’ Nature 438 (1 December): 548-549. doi:10.1038/438548a
Comai, L, Cartwright, R. (2005). ‘A Toxic Mutator and Selection Alternative to the Non-Mendelian RNA Cache Hypothesis for hothead Reversion,’ The Plant Cell 17: 2856-2858. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.036293
Lolle, S.J., Victor, J.L., Young, J.M., Pruitt, R.E. (2005). ‘Genome-wide non-mendelian inheritance of extra-genomic information in Arabidopsis’ Nature 434 (24 March 2005), 505-509. doi:10.1038/nature03380
Secko, D. (2007). ‘Scooped by a blog, ‘ The Scientist 21(4): 21.
Trench, B. (2012) ‘Scientists’ blogs – glimpses behind the scenes,’ In: Rodder, Simone and Franzen, Martina andWeingart, Peter, (eds.) The Sciences’ Media Connection – public communication and its repercussions, Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 273-290. ISBN 978-94-007-2084-8